🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.